SB26-137 · Bill · 2026 Regular Session · Colorado

Measures to Reduce Administrative Burdens

Concerning measures to reduce administrative burdens, and, in connection therewith, making changes to the mandatory review of department rules by each principal department and clarifying the attorney general's scope of authority related to litigation discovery.

Official status: Became Law

3 proposed amendments

Prime sponsors

Progress (from the official record)

Official summary

Official text — shown in English exactly as published by the official source. The official text controls.

Current law requires each principal department of the state (department) to establish a schedule to review all of its rules. The act requires the review to occur at least every 5 years. Current law directs each department to make certain determinations when conducting the review of the rules. The act requires the following additional determinations: Whether the department has rules with the same or similar purpose, intent, or goal and, if so, how those are coordinated and whether redundant rules can be eliminated; Whether the rule is outdated or obsolete; Whether funding levels to support the program or function subject to the rule are appropriate; and Whether there are opportunities to improve the effectiveness of the rule in meeting its purpose, intent, or goal. Current law requires each department to present a report at its 'SMART Act' hearing regarding its mandatory review of all rules. The act permits the committee of reference presiding over the 'SMART Act' hearing to make a recommendation whether a program or function subject to the rules should be subject to a sunset review or may make a recommendation to the legislative audit committee for an audit by the office of the state auditor. The act clarifies the attorney general's responsibility regarding litigation discovery on behalf of the state of Colorado or on behalf of the people of the state of Colorado. (Note: This summary applies to this bill as enacted.)

Status timeline

Every recorded action on SB26-137, oldest first
DateLocationAction
03/11/2026SenateIntroduced In Senate - Assigned to Finance
03/31/2026SenateSenate Committee on Finance Refer Amended to Appropriations
04/10/2026SenateSenate Committee on Appropriations Refer Unamended - Consent Calendar to Senate Committee of the Whole
04/10/2026SenateSenate Second Reading Special Order - Passed - No Amendments
04/10/2026SenateSenate Second Reading Special Order - Passed with Amendments - Committee
04/13/2026SenateSenate Third Reading Passed - No Amendments
04/13/2026HouseIntroduced In House - Assigned to Business Affairs & Labor
04/22/2026HouseHouse Committee on Business Affairs & Labor Refer Unamended to House Committee of the Whole
04/24/2026HouseHouse Second Reading Laid Over Daily - No Amendments
04/27/2026HouseHouse Second Reading Special Order - Passed - No Amendments
04/28/2026HouseHouse Third Reading Passed - No Amendments
05/04/2026SenateSigned by the President of the Senate
05/05/2026HouseSigned by the Speaker of the House
05/05/2026GovernorSent to the Governor
05/14/2026GovernorGovernor Signed

Recorded votes

Proposed amendments (3 proposed amendments)

Amendments proposed to SB26-137, oldest first
AmendmentCommittee / floor hearingOfferedDispositionOfficial document
L.001Committee amendment — Finance (Senate)03/31/2026PassedView official document
L.002Committee amendment — Finance (Senate)03/31/2026PassedView official document
L.003
Sponsor: Representative Luck
Floor amendment — Second Reading (House)04/27/2026LostView official document

Source: Colorado General Assembly (leg.colorado.gov) · Data as of

Full text

Full text — side-by-side reader

Showing the latest official version: Signed Act version (official PDF), 05/14/2026

Official text — shown in English exactly as published by the official source. The official text controls.

0 SENATE BILL 26-137

BY SENATOR(S) Coleman and Simpson, Amabile, Bridges, Carson, Catlin, Daugherty, Exum, Frizell, Gonzales J., Kirkmeyer, Lindstedt, Marchman, Mullica, Roberts, Snyder; also REPRESENTATIVE(S) McCluskie and Caldwell, Boesenecker, Clifford, Duran, Flanell, Gonzalez R., Marshall, Ricks, Rydin.

CONCERNING MEASURES TO REDUCE ADMINISTRATIVE BURDENS, AND, IN CONNECTION THEREWITH, MAKING CHANGES TO THE MANDATORY REVIEW OF DEPARTMENT RULES BY EACH PRINCIPAL DEPARTMENT AND CLARIFYING THE ATTORNEY GENERAL'S SCOPE OF AUTHORITY RELATED TO LITIGATION DISCOVERY.

Be it enacted by the General Assembly of the State of Colorado:

SECTION 1. In Colorado Revised Statutes, 24-4-103 .3, amend (1) introductory portion, (1 )( e), ( 1)(g), and (4); repeal (3 ); and add (1 )(i), (l)(j), (l)(k), and (1)(1) as follows: 24-4-103.3. Mandatory review of rules by agencies - report on results of review in departmental regulatory agendas - definitions. ( 1)

The department of I egulatory agencies EACH PRINCIPAL

Capital letters or bold & italic numbers indicate new material added to existing law; dashes through words or numbers indicate deletions from existing law and such material is not part of the act.

DEPARTMENT shall establish a schedule in consultation with each ptineipal

department, for the PERIODIC review of all of the DEPARTMENT'S rules for each ptincipal department TO OCCUR AT LEAST EVERY FIVE YEARS. Each principal department shall conduct a review of all of its rules to assess the continuing need for and the appropriateness and cost-effectiveness of its rules to determine if they should be continued in their current form, modified, or repealed. The applicable rule-making agency or official in the principal department shall consider the following: ( e) Whether the rule can be amended to give more flexibility, reduce regulatory burdens, or reduce unnecessary paperwork or steps while

maintaining MEETING its INTENDED GOALS AND benefits; (g) Whether a cost-benefit analysis was performed by the applicable rule-making agency or official in the principal department pursuant to section 24-4-103 (2.5) and OR AN EQUIVALENT ANALYSIS PURSUANT TO SECTION 25-7-110.5; (i)

WHETHER THERE ARE OTHER RULES ADOPTED BY THE

RULE-MAKING AGENCY OR OFFICIAL THAT HA VE THE SAME OR SIMILAR PURPOSE, INTENT, OR GOAL; HOW THOSE ARE COORDINATED; AND WHETHER REDUNDANCIES CAN BE ELIM INATED;

G) WHETHER THE RULE IS OUTDATED OR OBSOLETE; (k)

WHETHER FUNDING LEVELS TO SUPPORT THE PROGRAM OR

FUNCTION SUBJECT TO THE RULE ARE APPROPRIATE. As USED IN THIS SUBSECTION ( 1)(k), "APPROPRIATE" MEANS SUFFICIENT TO ADMINISTER AND ENFORCE THE PROGRAM OR RULE IN COMPLIANCE WITH STA TE AND FEDERAL LAW, WITHIN EXISTING APPROPRIATIONS AND AUTHORIZED FEE STRUCTURES.

(I)

WHETHER THERE ARE OPPORTUNITIES TO IMPROVE THE

EFFECTIVENESS OF THE RULE IN MEETING ITS PURPOSE, INTENT, OR GOAL. AS USED IN THIS SUBSECTION ( 1)(I), "OPPORTUNITIES" MEANS REASONABLE AND LEGALLY PERMISSIBLE ADJUSTMENTS WITHIN THE AGENCY'S EXISTING STATUTORY AUTHORITY THAT WOULD IMPROVE IMPLEMENTATION OR ADMINISTRATION OF THE RULE.

(3) The department of t egulatory agencies shall not schedule mandatory teview undet this section during the yeat of and during the yeat

following any scheduled sunset review conducted by the department of regulatory agencies pmsuant to section 24-34-104. (4) (a)

Each principal department shall include a report on the

results of its mandatory review of rules as part of its departmental regulatory agenda that it submits to the staff of the legislative council for distribution to the applicable committee of reference of the general assembly as outlined in section 2-7-203.

C.R.S. THE COMMITTEE OF

REFERENCE SHALL REVIEW THE DEPARTMENTAL REPORT DURING THE COMMITTEE'S "SMART ACT" HEARING. (b)

IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PROCESS SET FORTH IN SECTION

24-34-104 (6)(a) AND (6)(c), THE COMMITTEE OF REFERENCE MAY MAKE A RECOMMENDATION WHETHER A PROGRAM OR FUNCTION SUBJECT TO THE RULES SHOULD BE SUBJECT TO A SUNSET REVIEW PURSUANT TO SECTION 24-34-104 (5) OR MAY MAKE A RECOMMENDATION TO THE LEGISLATIVE AUDIT COMMITTEE FOR AN AUDIT BY THE OFFICE OF THE STATE AUDITOR PURSUANT TO SECTION 2-3-108.

SECTION 2. In Colorado Revised Statutes, 24-31-101, add (6) as follows:

24-31-101. Powers and duties of attorney general. (6) IN ANY ACTION BROUGHT BY THE ATTORNEY GENERAL IN THE ATTORNEY GENERAL'S OFFICIAL CAPACITY, OR ON THE RELATION OF THE STATE OF COLORADO OR THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF COLORADO, TO ENFORCE THE LAW AS AUTHORIZED BY STATUTE OR COMMON LAW, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL SHALL NOT BE DEEMED TO PURSUE AN ACTION ON BEHALF OF ANY OTHER STATE OFFICER OR ANY

STATE AGENCY,

DEPARTMENT, OFFICE, BOARD, COMMISSION, OR ENTERPRISE AND SHALL NOT BE DEEMED IN POSSESSION, CUSTODY, OR CONTROL OF ANY RECORD THAT IS MADE, KEPT, OR MAINTAINED BY ANY OTHER STA TE OFFICER OR ANY STA TE AGENCY, DEPARTMENT, OFFICE, BOARD, COMMISSION, OR ENTERPRISE FOR THE PURPOSE OF ANY DISCOVERY REQUEST DIRECTED AT THE ATTORNEY GENERAL IN THE ATTORNEY GENERAL'S OFFICIAL CAPACITY, OR ON THE RELATION OF THE STATE OF COLORADO OR THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF COLORADO, AS A PARTY TO SUCH ACTION.

SECTION 3. Act subject to petition - effective date. This act

takes effect at 12:01 a.m. on the day following the expiration of the ninety-day period after final adjournment of the general assembly (August 12, 2026, if adjournment sine die is on May 13, 2026); except that, if a referendum petition is filed pursuant to section 1 (3) of article V of the state constitution against this act or an item, section, or part of this act within such period, then the act, item, section, or part will not take effect unless approved by the people at the general election to be held in November 2026 and, in such case, will take effect on the date of the official declaration of the vote thereon by the governor.

Julie McCluskie SPEAKER OF THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

James Rashad Coleman, Sr. PRESIDENT OF THE SENATE

Vanessa Reilly CHIEF CLERK OF THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

Esther van Mourik SECRETARY OF THE SENATE

APPROVED on Thursday May 14th 2026 at 11:00am (Date and Time)

Jared S. Polis GOVERNOR OF THE STATE OF COLORADO

Official record

View SB26-137 on leg.colorado.gov

Source: Colorado General Assembly (leg.colorado.gov) · Data as of

Verify this record

This record carries a fingerprint of its official content, computed by our data pipeline with the SHA-256 algorithm — a real computation over the record itself, not a badge we award ourselves. Anyone can recompute it from the official source and compare.

SHA-256 fingerprint

42c947ff82b771f8a6d249d27b2dd27ad84555dc428fdcb43478acf106b22456

What it covers: the record exactly as the official source publishes it — its identifiers (bill number, session, jurisdiction), its official title and long title, its official summary, its status, its sponsors in published order, every recorded action, every recorded vote, and the link to each official text version — assembled in a fixed canonical form described on the How this data works page.

Computed 2026-11-06 · Algorithm: SHA-256 · Canonical form: rogata-canonical-v1

Source: Colorado General Assembly (leg.colorado.gov) · Data as of

The fingerprint does not cover our retrieval date (the “Data as of” stamp in the source line): re-fetching unchanged official content produces the same fingerprint, while any change to the official content changes it.

If you recompute the fingerprint from the official source and get a different value, one of us is out of date — please report it through the corrections log.