Clarify Excessive Public Construction Bond Claim Penalty
Concerning clarification of the penalty for claiming an excessive amount in a public construction performance bond dispute.
Official status: Became Law
Prime sponsors
- John Carson (Senate) — Prime Sponsor
- Marc Snyder (Senate) — Prime Sponsor
- Sean Camacho (House) — Prime Sponsor
- Kenny Nguyen (House) — Prime Sponsor
Progress (from the official record)
Official summary
Official text — shown in English exactly as published by the official source. The official text controls.
Currently, a contractor on a private construction project has a statutory right to secure payment with a general mechanic's lien. However, if the contractor knowingly files on the lien for an excessive amount, the contractor forfeits all rights to the lien and is liable to the person against whom the lien was filed for costs and attorney fees. A contractor on a public construction project has a similar right to secure payment by filing a verified statement of claim, which requires the project owner to withhold funds sufficient to pay the claim, usually in the form of a bond. The act clarifies that a public construction contractor who knowingly files a verified statement of claim for an excessive amount forfeits all rights pursuant to the verified statement of claim. Thus, the act aligns, for both a private and public construction contractor, the penalty for claiming an excessive amount on a lien or verified statement of claim to the loss of rights related to that lien or verified statement of claim, respectively. The act expressly allows for a private mechanic's lien or public verified statement of claim to include costs otherwise allowed under a contract in the lien or verified statement of claim amount, including costs incurred as a result of delay, lost productivity, or other disruption to the work. The act also clarifies that an award by a court for an amount less than the amount claimed in a lien or verified statement of claim does not render the amount claimed excessive. (Note: This summary applies to this bill as enacted.)
Status timeline
| Date | Location | Action |
|---|---|---|
| 01/28/2026 | Senate | Introduced In Senate - Assigned to Judiciary |
| 02/09/2026 | Senate | Senate Committee on Judiciary Refer Unamended - Consent Calendar to Senate Committee of the Whole |
| 02/12/2026 | Senate | Senate Second Reading Passed - No Amendments |
| 02/13/2026 | Senate | Senate Third Reading Laid Over to 02/17/2026 - No Amendments |
| 02/17/2026 | Senate | Senate Third Reading Passed - No Amendments |
| 02/18/2026 | House | Introduced In House - Assigned to Judiciary |
| 03/10/2026 | House | House Committee on Judiciary Refer Amended to House Committee of the Whole |
| 03/13/2026 | House | House Second Reading Laid Over Daily - No Amendments |
| 03/16/2026 | House | House Second Reading Special Order - Passed with Amendments - Committee |
| 03/17/2026 | House | House Third Reading Passed - No Amendments |
| 03/19/2026 | Senate | Senate Considered House Amendments - Result was to Concur - Repass |
| 03/26/2026 | Senate | Signed by the President of the Senate |
| 03/26/2026 | House | Signed by the Speaker of the House |
| 03/27/2026 | Governor | Sent to the Governor |
| 04/06/2026 | Governor | Governor Signed |
Recorded votes
- 03/10/2026 — House Judiciary: “Refer Senate Bill 26-074, as amended, to the Committee of the Whole.” — the motion passed on a vote of 10–0.
- 02/09/2026 — Senate Judiciary: “Refer Senate Bill 26-074 to the Committee of the Whole and with a recommendation that it be placed on the consent calendar.” — the motion passed on a vote of 7–0.
Proposed amendments (4 proposed amendments)
| Amendment | Committee / floor hearing | Offered | Disposition | Official document |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| L.001 | Committee amendment — Judiciary (House) | 03/10/2026 | Passed | View official document |
| L.005 | Committee amendment — Judiciary (House) | 03/10/2026 | Passed | View official document |
| L.006 | Committee amendment — Judiciary (House) | 03/10/2026 | Passed | View official document |
| L.004 | Committee amendment — Judiciary (House) | 03/10/2026 | Passed | View official document |
Source: Colorado General Assembly (leg.colorado.gov) · Data as of
Full text
- Signed Act version (official PDF), 04/06/2026
- Final Act version (official PDF), 03/20/2026
- Rerevised version (official PDF), 03/17/2026
- Revised version (official PDF), 03/16/2026
- Reengrossed version (official PDF), 02/17/2026
- Engrossed version (official PDF), 02/12/2026
- Introduced version (official PDF), 01/28/2026
Full text — side-by-side reader
Showing the latest official version: Signed Act version (official PDF), 04/06/2026
Official text — shown in English exactly as published by the official source. The official text controls.
SENATE BILL 26-074
BY SENATOR(S) Carson and Snyder, Liston, Pelton R.; also REPRESENTATIVE(S) Camacho and Nguyen, Bacon, Carter, Duran, Marshall.
CONCERNING CLARIFICATION OF THE PENALTY FOR CLAIMING AN EXCESSIVE AMOUNT IN A PUBLIC CONSTRUCTION PERFORMANCE BOND DISPUTE.
Be it enacted by the General Assembly of the State of Colorado: SECTION 1. In Colorado Revised Statutes, 3 8-22-10 I, amend (1 ); and add (7) as follows: 38-22-101. Liens in favor of whom - when filed. (1) Every person who furnishes or supplies laborers, machinery, tools, or equipment in the prosecution of the work, and mechanics, materialmen, contractors, subcontractors, builders, and all persons of every class performing labor upon or furnishing directly to the owner or persons furnishing labor, laborers, or materials to be used in construction, alteration, improvement, addition to, or repair, either in whole or in part, of any building, mill, bridge, ditch, flume, aqueduct, reservoir, tunnel, fence, railroad, wagon road, tramway, or any other structure or improvement upon
Capital letters or bold & italic numbers indicate new material added to existing law; dashes through words or numbers indicate deletions from existing law and such material is not part of the act.
land, including adjacent curb, gutter, and sidewalk, and also architects, engineers, draftsmen, and artisans who have furnished designs, plans, plats, maps, specifications, drawings, estimates of cost, surveys, or superintendence, or who have rendered other professional or skilled service, or bestowed labor in whole or in part, describing or illustrating, or superintending such structure, or work done or to be done, or any part connected therewith, shall have a lien upon the property upon which they have furnished laborers or supplied machinery, tools, or equipment or rendered service or bestowed labor or for which they have furnished materials or mining or milling machinery or other fixtures, for the value, WHETHER DISPUTED OR UNDISPUTED, of such laborers, machinery' tools, or equipment supplied, or services rendered or labor done or laborers or materials furnished, whether at the instance of the owner, or of any other person acting by the owner's authority or under the owner, as agent, contractor, or otherwise for the laborers, machinery, tools, or equipment supplied, or work or labor done or services rendered or laborers or materials furnished by each, respectively, whether supplied or done or furnished or rendered at the instance of the owner of the building or other improvement, or the owner's agent; and every contractor, architect, engineer, subcontractor, builder, agent, or other person having charge of the construction, alteration, addition to, or repair, either in whole or in part, of said building or other improvement shall be held to be the agent of the owner for the purposes of this article ARTICLE 22. (7) NOTHING IN THIS ARTICLE 22 PROHIBITS THE INCLUSION OF COSTS OTHERWISE ALLOWED UNDER A CONTRACT IN A LIEN, INCLUDING COSTS INCURRED AS A RESULT OF DELAY, LOST PRODUCTIVITY, OR OTHER DISRUPTION TO THE WORK. SECTION 2. In Colorado Revised Statutes, 38-22-128, add (2) and
(3) as follows:
38-22-128. Excessive amounts claimed. (2) AN AWARD BY A COURT HA YING JURISDICTION OF AN AMOUNT THAT IS LESS THAN THE AMOUNT FOR WHICH A PERSON'S LIEN WAS FILED DOES NOT RENDER THE AMOUNT EXCESSIVE FOR PURPOSES OF SUBSECTION ( 1) OF THIS SECTION IF THE PERSON HAD AGOOD FAITH BASIS TO BELIEVE THE LIEN AMOUNT WAS DUE AT TIME OF FILING.
(3) FOR PURPOSES OF THIS SECTION, AN AMOUNT IS "DUE" IF A PERSON REASONABLY BELIEVES, IN GOOD FAITH, THAT THE AMOUNT REPRESENTS THE VALUE OF THE LABOR, SERVICES, EQUIPMENT, OR OTHER MATERIALS OR PERSONS FURNISHED OR SUPPLIED TO A CONTRACTOR, AS DESCRIBED IN SECTION 38-22-101 (1), WHETHER OR NOT THE AMOUNT IS UNLIQUIDATED OR DISPUTED. SECTION 3. In Colorado Revised Statutes, 38-26-107, amend (1)
as follows: 38-26-107. Supplier may file statement - notice - withholding funds.
(1) Any person, as defined in section 2-4-401 (8), C.R.S., that has furnished labor, materials, EQUIPMENT, SERVICES, sustenance, or other supplies used or consumed by a contractor or his e,r her THEIR subcontractor in or about the performance of the work contracted to be done or that supplies laborers, rental machinery, tools, or equipment to the extent used in the prosecution of the work whose claim therefor has not been paid by the contractor or the subcontractor may, at any time up to and including the time of final settlement for the work contracted to be done, file with the board, officer, person, or other contracting body by whom the contract was awarded a verified statement of the amount due and unpaid on account of the claim, WHETHER THE AMOUNT IS DISPUTED OR UNDISPUTED. NOTHING IN THIS ARTICLE 26 PROHIBITS THE INCLUSION OF COSTS OTHERWISE ALLOWED UNDER A CONTRACT IN A VERIFIED STATEMENT OF CLAIM, INCLUDING COSTS INCURRED AS A RESULT OF DELAY, LOST PRODUCTIVITY, OR OTHER
DISRUPTION TO THE WORK. If the amount of the contract awarded to the contractor exceeds one hundred fifty thousand dollars, the board, officer, person, or other contracting body by whom the contract was awarded shall, no later than ten days before the final settlement is made, publish a notice of the final settlement at least twice in a newspaper of general circulation in any county where the work was contracted for or performed or in an electronic medium approved by the executive director of the department of personnel. It is unlawful for any person to divide a public works contract into two or more separate contracts for the sole purpose of evading or attempting to evade the requirements of this subsection (1). SECTION 4. In Colorado Revised Statutes, 38-26-110, amend ( 1) introductory portion; and add (2) and (3) as follows:
38-26-110. Excessive amounts claimed. ( 1) Any person who files a verified statement of a claim or asserts a claim against a principal or surety that has furnished a bond under this article ARTICLE 26 for an amount greater than the amount due without a reasonable possibility that the amount claimed is due and with the knowledge that the amount claimed is greater than the amount due, and that fact is demonstrated in any proceedings under this article ARTICLE 26, shall forfeit all rights to the amount claimed VERIFIED STATEMENT OF CLAIM and shall be liable to the following in an amount equal to all costs and all attorney fees reasonably incurred in bonding over, contesting, or otherwise responding in any way to the excessive verified statement of claim or excessive bond claim:
(2) AN AWARD BY A COURT HAVING JURISDICTION OF AN AMOUNT THAT IS LESS THAN THE AMOUNT IN A PERSON'S VERIFIED STATEMENT OF CLAIM DOES NOT RENDER THAT AMOUNT EXCESSIVE FOR PURPOSES OF SUBSECTION ( 1) OF THIS SECTION IF THE PERSON HAD A GOOD FAITH BASIS TO BELIEVE THE AMOUNT IN THE VERIFIED STATEMENT OF CLAIM WAS DUE AT THE TIME OF FILING.
FOR PURPOSES OF THIS SECTION, "AMOUNT DUE" MEANS THE
AMOUNT OF MONEY A PERSON REASONABLY BELIEVES, IN GOOD FAITH, REPRESENTS THE VALUE OF THE LABOR, MATERIALS, SUSTENANCE, OTHER SUPPLIES, LABORERS,
RENTAL MACHINERY, TOOLS, OR EQUIPMENT,
FURNISHED OR SUPPLIED TO A CONTRACTOR, AS DEFINED IN SECTION
38-26-101, OR THEIR SUBCONTRACTOR, WHETHER OR NOT THE AMOUNT IS UNLIQUIDATED OR DISPUTED, AS SET FORTH IN SECTION 38-26-107 (1).
SECTION 5. Act subject to petition - effective date. This act takes effect at 12:01 a.m. on the day following the expiration of the ninety-day period after final adjournment of the general assembly (August 12, 2026, if adjournment sine die is on May 13, 2026); except that, if a referendum petition is filed pursuant to section 1 (3) of article V of the state constitution against this act or an item, section, or part of this act within such period, then the act, item, section, or part will not take effect unless
approved by the people at the general election to be held in November 2026 and, in such case, will take effect on the date of the official declaration of the vote thereon by the governor.
Julie McCluskie SPEAKER OF THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
James Rashad Coleman, Sr. PRESIDENT OF THE SENATE
Vanessa Reilly CHIEF CLERK OF THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
Esther van Mourik SECRETARY OF THE SENATE
APPROVED on Monday April 6th 2026 at 11:00am (Date and Time)
Jared S. Polis GOVERNOR OF THE STATE OF COLORADO
Official record
View SB26-074 on leg.colorado.gov
Source: Colorado General Assembly (leg.colorado.gov) · Data as of
Verify this record
This record carries a fingerprint of its official content, computed by our data pipeline with the SHA-256 algorithm — a real computation over the record itself, not a badge we award ourselves. Anyone can recompute it from the official source and compare.
SHA-256 fingerprint
ceb6cfc7e7e3ac2f497ec4022ae373942499a4ffc7aab54e6517c67af946748b
What it covers: the record exactly as the official source publishes it — its identifiers (bill number, session, jurisdiction), its official title and long title, its official summary, its status, its sponsors in published order, every recorded action, every recorded vote, and the link to each official text version — assembled in a fixed canonical form described on the How this data works page.
The fingerprint does not cover our retrieval date (the “Data as of” stamp in the source line): re-fetching unchanged official content produces the same fingerprint, while any change to the official content changes it.
If you recompute the fingerprint from the official source and get a different value, one of us is out of date — please report it through the corrections log.
