Audit Enforcement
Concerning the enforcement of recommendations made by the state auditor.
Official status: Lost
Prime sponsors
- Max Brooks (House) — Prime Sponsor
- Larry Don Suckla (House) — Prime Sponsor
- Lisa Frizell (Senate) — Prime Sponsor
Progress (from the official record)
Official summary
Official text — shown in English exactly as published by the official source. The official text controls.
The bill defines "noncompliant state agency" with respect to the implementation date for an audit recommendation and requires the legislative audit committee (committee) to determine, by majority vote, whether or not a noncompliant state agency has made a good faith effort to comply with an audit recommendation by the implementation date. If the committee determines that the noncompliant state agency has made a good faith effort, the committee may accept an extended implementation date provided by the noncompliant state agency. If the committee determines there has not been a good faith effort, the committee may direct the state auditor to notify the state controller of the noncompliant state agency. The bill also requires the state controller to, upon receipt of notice from the state auditor, restrict, in an amount equal to 3% of the total amount of the noncompliant state agency's general fund appropriations, the noncompliant state agency's appropriations for the fiscal year following the fiscal year in which the state controller receives the notice from the state auditor. This restriction may only be released if the general assembly enacts a bill to do so, or if the committee directs the state auditor to notify the state controller to rescind the restriction. (Note: This summary applies to this bill as introduced.)
Status timeline
| Date | Location | Action |
|---|---|---|
| 02/18/2026 | House | Introduced In House - Assigned to State, Civic, Military, & Veterans Affairs |
| 03/12/2026 | House | House Committee on State, Civic, Military, & Veterans Affairs Postpone Indefinitely |
Recorded votes
- 03/12/2026 — House State, Civic, Military, & Veterans Affairs: “Refer House Bill 26-1254, as amended, to the Committee of the Whole.” — the motion failed on a vote of 3–8.
- 03/12/2026 — House State, Civic, Military, & Veterans Affairs: “Postpone House Bill 26-1254 indefinitely using a reversal of the previous roll call. There was no objection to the use of the reverse roll call, therefore, the bill was postponed indefinitely.” — the motion passed on a vote of 8–3.
Proposed amendments (1 proposed amendment)
| Amendment | Committee / floor hearing | Offered | Disposition | Official document |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| L.001 | Committee amendment — State, Civic, Military, & Veterans Affairs (House) | 03/12/2026 | Passed | View official document |
Source: Colorado General Assembly (leg.colorado.gov) · Data as of
Full text
Full text — side-by-side reader
Showing the latest official version: Introduced version (official PDF), 02/18/2026
Official text — shown in English exactly as published by the official source. The official text controls.
Second Regular Session Seventy-fifth General Assembly STATE OF COLORADO INTRODUCED HOUSE BILL 26-1254 LLS NO. 26-0781.03 Stephanie Schrab x4330 HOUSE SPONSORSHIP Brooks and Suckla, Bacon SENATE SPONSORSHIP Frizell, House Committees Senate Committees State, Civic, Military, & Veterans Affairs A BILL FOR AN ACT CONCERNING THE ENFORCEMENT OF RECOMMENDATIONS MADE BY THE STATE AUDITOR.
Bill Summary (Note: This summary applies to this bill as introduced and does not reflect any amendments that may be subsequently adopted. If this bill passes third reading in the house of introduction, a bill summary that applies to the reengrossed version of this bill will be available at http://leg.colorado.gov.) The bill defines "noncompliant state agency" with respect to the implementation date for an audit recommendation and requires the legislative audit committee (committee) to determine, by majority vote, whether or not a noncompliant state agency has made a good faith effort to comply with an audit recommendation by the implementation date. If the committee determines that the noncompliant state agency has made Shading denotes HOUSE amendment. Double underlining denotes SENATE amendment.
Capital letters or bold & italic numbers indicate new material to be added to existing law. Dashes through the words or numbers indicate deletions from existing law.
a good faith effort, the committee may accept an extended implementation date provided by the noncompliant state agency. If the committee determines there has not been a good faith effort, the committee may direct the state auditor to notify the state controller of the noncompliant state agency. The bill also requires the state controller to, upon receipt of notice from the state auditor, restrict, in an amount equal to 3% of the total amount of the noncompliant state agency's general fund appropriations, the noncompliant state agency's appropriations for the fiscal year following the fiscal year in which the state controller receives the notice from the state auditor. This restriction may only be released if the general assembly enacts a bill to do so, or if the committee directs the state auditor to notify the state controller to rescind the restriction.
Be it enacted by the General Assembly of the State of Colorado:
SECTION 1. In Colorado Revised Statutes, 2-3-103, add (9.6) as follows:
2-3-103. Duties of state auditor - definitions.
(9.6) (a) AS USED IN THIS SECTION, UNLESS THE CONTEXT OTHERWISE REQUIRES:
(I) "STATE AGENCY" MEANS A PRINCIPAL DEPARTMENT OF THE EXECUTIVE BRANCH OF STATE GOVERNMENT OR ANY DIVISION OR PROGRAM WITHIN A PRINCIPAL DEPARTMENT.
(II) "NONCOMPLIANT STATE AGENCY" MEANS A STATE AGENCY THAT:
(A) WAS SUBJECT TO AN AUDIT THAT IDENTIFIED A SIGNIFICANT PROBLEM OR A MATERIAL WEAKNESS IN THE STATE AGENCY;
(B) HAS, AT A HEARING OF THE LEGISLATIVE AUDIT COMMITTEE, AGREED OR PARTIALLY AGREED TO THE AUDIT RECOMMENDATION AND SELECTED A DATE FOR IMPLEMENTING THE AUDITOR'S RECOMMENDATION;
AND
(C) HAS NOT COMPLETED THE AUDIT RECOMMENDATION BY THAT IMPLEMENTATION DATE.
(b) IF A STATE AGENCY BECOMES A NONCOMPLIANT STATE AGENCY, THE LEGISLATIVE AUDIT COMMITTEE SHALL, AT ITS NEXT REGULAR MEETING AND WITH A REPRESENTATIVE OF THE NONCOMPLIANT STATE AGENCY PRESENT, DETERMINE WHETHER THE NONCOMPLIANT STATE AGENCY HAS MADE A GOOD FAITH EFFORT TO COMPLETE THE RECOMMENDATION OF THE AUDIT BY THE IMPLEMENTATION DATE.
(c) (I) IF THE LEGISLATIVE AUDIT COMMITTEE DETERMINES BY A MAJORITY VOTE THAT THE NONCOMPLIANT STATE AGENCY HAS MADE A GOOD FAITH EFFORT TO IMPLEMENT THE RECOMMENDATION BY THE IMPLEMENTATION DATE, THE COMMITTEE MAY ACCEPT AN EXTENDED IMPLEMENTATION DATE PROVIDED BY THE NONCOMPLIANT STATE AGENCY.
(II) IF THE LEGISLATIVE AUDIT COMMITTEE DETERMINES BY A MAJORITY VOTE THAT THE NONCOMPLIANT STATE AGENCY HAS NOT MADE A GOOD FAITH EFFORT TO IMPLEMENT THE RECOMMENDATION BY THE IMPLEMENTATION DATE, THE COMMITTEE MAY DIRECT THE STATE AUDITOR TO TAKE THE ACTIONS SPECIFIED IN SUBSECTION (9.6)(e) OF THIS SECTION.
(d) IF THE LEGISLATIVE AUDIT COMMITTEE EXTENDS THE IMPLEMENTATION DATE AS SPECIFIED IN SUBSECTION (9.6)(c)(I) OF THIS SECTION AND THE NONCOMPLIANT STATE AGENCY DOES NOT COMPLETE THE AUDIT RECOMMENDATION BY THE EXTENDED IMPLEMENTATION DATE, THE LEGISLATIVE AUDIT COMMITTEE MAY AGAIN DETERMINE WHETHER THE NONCOMPLIANT STATE AGENCY MADE A GOOD FAITH EFFORT TO IMPLEMENT THE AUDIT RECOMMENDATION PURSUANT TO SUBSECTION (9.6)(b) OF THIS SECTION AND MAY THEN TAKE EITHER ACTION SPECIFIED IN SUBSECTION (9.6)(c) OF THIS SECTION.
(e) THE LEGISLATIVE AUDIT COMMITTEE, BY A MAJORITY VOTE OF THE COMMITTEE, MAY DIRECT THE STATE AUDITOR TO NOTIFY THE STATE CONTROLLER WHEN A NONCOMPLIANT STATE AGENCY HAS NOT MADE A GOOD FAITH EFFORT TO COMPLETE AN AUDIT RECOMMENDATION BY THE IMPLEMENTATION DATE.
(f) THE STATE AUDITOR SHALL MAKE ONLY ONE NOTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SUBSECTION (9.6)(e) OF THIS SECTION FOR A NONCOMPLIANT STATE AGENCY FOR A SINGLE AUDIT, REGARDLESS OF THE NUMBER OF AUDIT RECOMMENDATIONS THAT CAUSED THE STATE AGENCY TO BECOME A NONCOMPLIANT STATE AGENCY.
SECTION 2. In Colorado Revised Statutes, add 24-30-211 as follows:
24-30-211. Restriction of general fund appropriation - state agency noncompliance with audit requirements - state auditor notice.
IF THE STATE CONTROLLER RECEIVES NOTICE FROM THE STATE AUDITOR OF A NONCOMPLIANT STATE AGENCY PURSUANT TO SECTION 2-3-103 (9.6), THE STATE CONTROLLER SHALL RESTRICT, IN AN AMOUNT EQUAL TO THREE PERCENT OF THE TOTAL AMOUNT OF THE NONCOMPLIANT STATE AGENCY'S GENERAL FUND APPROPRIATIONS, THE NONCOMPLIANT STATE AGENCY'S APPROPRIATIONS FOR THE FISCAL YEAR FOLLOWING THE FISCAL YEAR IN WHICH THE STATE CONTROLLER RECEIVES THE NOTICE FROM THE STATE AUDITOR. THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY MAY ENACT A BILL TO RELEASE THE RESTRICTION, OR THE LEGISLATIVE AUDIT COMMITTEE MAY, BY MAJORITY VOTE, DIRECT THE STATE AUDITOR TO NOTIFY THE STATE CONTROLLER TO RESCIND THE RESTRICTION IF THE STATE AUDITOR DETERMINES THAT THE STATE AGENCY HAS BECOME COMPLIANT BEFORE THE RESTRICTION TAKES EFFECT.
SECTION 3. Act subject to petition - effective date. This act takes effect at 12:01 a.m. on the day following the expiration of the ninety-day period after final adjournment of the general assembly (August 12, 2026, if adjournment sine die is on May 13, 2026); except that, if a referendum petition is filed pursuant to section 1 (3) of article V of the state constitution against this act or an item, section, or part of this act within such period, then the act, item, section, or part will not take effect unless approved by the people at the general election to be held in November 2026 and, in such case, will take effect on the date of the official declaration of the vote thereon by the governor.
Official record
View HB26-1254 on leg.colorado.gov
Source: Colorado General Assembly (leg.colorado.gov) · Data as of
Verify this record
This record carries a fingerprint of its official content, computed by our data pipeline with the SHA-256 algorithm — a real computation over the record itself, not a badge we award ourselves. Anyone can recompute it from the official source and compare.
SHA-256 fingerprint
dc88a091cbbe323baf2bc8c8a6dd2e88c2d166c2c8dee786849ed444f0b698b2
What it covers: the record exactly as the official source publishes it — its identifiers (bill number, session, jurisdiction), its official title and long title, its official summary, its status, its sponsors in published order, every recorded action, every recorded vote, and the link to each official text version — assembled in a fixed canonical form described on the How this data works page.
The fingerprint does not cover our retrieval date (the “Data as of” stamp in the source line): re-fetching unchanged official content produces the same fingerprint, while any change to the official content changes it.
If you recompute the fingerprint from the official source and get a different value, one of us is out of date — please report it through the corrections log.
