HB26-1195 · Bill · 2026 Regular Session · Colorado

Psychotherapy Artificial Intelligence Restrictions

☆ Watch

Concerning restrictions on the use of artificial intelligence relating to psychotherapy services.

Official status: Became Law

8 proposed amendments

Prime sponsors

• Gretchen Rydin (House) — Prime Sponsor
• Javier Mabrey (House) — Prime Sponsor
• Judy Amabile (Senate) — Prime Sponsor
• Kyle Mullica (Senate) — Prime Sponsor

Progress (from the official record)

Official summary

Official text — shown in English exactly as published by the official source. The official text controls.

The act prohibits individuals lawfully permitted to provide psychotherapy services in the state (regulated professionals) from allowing an artificial intelligence system (AI system) to interact with clients in any form of therapeutic communication without synchronous, real-time interaction between the regulated professional, the AI system, and the client, or generate therapeutic recommendations or treatment plans without review and approval by the regulated professional. Except for educational, administrative, simulation, or training purposes or as part of a research program, a regulated professional shall not use an AI system to provide, direct, or guide psychotherapy, clinical intervention, counseling, diagnosis, treatment planning, or other activity that constitutes the practice of psychotherapy with an individual or group unless the use satisfies the conditions specified in the act. At initial client contact, a regulated professional shall inform clients of the prohibitions regarding use of AI systems in the practice of psychotherapy. Regulated professionals may be disciplined by the appropriate licensing board in the department of regulatory agencies for violations of this act. The act allows regulated professionals to use an AI system to assist in providing administrative support or supplementary support, as these terms are defined in the act, for psychotherapy services if the regulated professional maintains responsibility for reviewing any outputs of the AI system used to provide administrative support or supplementary support. If a client's therapeutic session will be recorded or transcribed through the use of an AI system, the regulated professional must disclose in advance the use of an AI system and the purposes for its use, and obtain written, informed consent from the client. The act does not prohibit a regulated professional from using an AI system within accredited or approved educational, instructional, or professional training programs, so long as the AI system is used solely for educational, administrative, simulation, or training purposes and is not deployed, marketed, or represented as a tool for use with clients, patients, or the public. Further, a regulated professional may be involved in the development, testing, or evaluation of an AI system solely for research purposes under the oversight of a federally registered institutional review board, so long as the AI system is not offered to consumers or used outside of the research setting. The act does not apply to regulated professionals who use or recommend the use of technology in the state that does not diagnose or treat mental health disorders, clearly discloses that the technology is not a substitute for clinical care, and: Provides self-help, therapeutic homework, coaching, patient navigation, guided meditation, journaling, or other tools specified in the act; or Is regulated by the federal food and drug administration. Except as provided in the act, the act also makes it an unfair or deceptive trade practice under the 'Colorado Consumer Protection Act' for an individual, corporation, or entity (person) to use any term, letter, or phrase in the use of an AI system in a manner that: Indicates or implies that the AI system's outputs are provided by, endorsed by, or equivalent to services provided by a regulated professional; Represents that the AI system provides psychotherapy services; or Represents that a user's data is confidential in a manner that would lead a reasonable user to believe that the privacy of their data is protected in a manner similar to therapist-client confidentiality. The act does not impose liability on a regulated professional for defects in or failures of an AI system that are attributable to the developer or deployer of the AI system. Further, under conditions specified in the act, nothing in the act prohibits a person from developing, testing, or evaluating an AI system solely for research purposes or using an AI system in educational, instructional, or training programs. In addition, it is not an unfair or deceptive trade practice for a person to use a technology that does not diagnose or treat mental health disorders, clearly discloses that the technology is not a substitute for clinical care, and: Provides self-help, therapeutic homework, coaching, patient navigation, guided meditation, journaling, or other tools specified in the act; or Is regulated by the federal food and drug administration. (Note: This summary applies to this bill as enacted.)

Status timeline

Recorded votes

• 05/06/2026 — Senate Health & Human Services: “Refer House Bill 26-1195, as amended, to the Committee of the Whole.” — the motion passed on a vote of 5–2.
• 03/04/2026 — House Health & Human Services: “Refer House Bill 26-1195, as amended, to the Committee of the Whole.” — the motion passed on a vote of 13–0.

Proposed amendments (8 proposed amendments)

Source: Colorado General Assembly (leg.colorado.gov) · Data as of 2026-11-05

Full text

• Signed Act version (official PDF), 06/03/2026
• Final Act version (official PDF), 06/02/2026
• Rerevised version (official PDF), 05/11/2026
• Revised version (official PDF), 05/08/2026
• Reengrossed version (official PDF), 04/16/2026
• Engrossed version (official PDF), 04/13/2026
• Introduced version (official PDF), 02/11/2026

Official record

View HB26-1195 on leg.colorado.gov

Source: Colorado General Assembly (leg.colorado.gov) · Data as of 2026-11-05