HB26-1123 · Bill · 2026 Regular Session · Colorado

Preventing Sexual Abuse in Jails

Concerning measures to prevent sexual abuse in jails, and, in connection therewith, making an appropriation.

Official status: Became Law

17 proposed amendments

Prime sponsors

Progress (from the official record)

Official summary

Official text — shown in English exactly as published by the official source. The official text controls.

The act permits a county or municipal jail (local detention facility) to conduct a strip search of a person who is detained in the local detention facility, only: When the facility is conducting intake of the detained person who has come in from outside the facility and a strip search upon intake is part of the detention facility's policy; When 2 personnel of the facility have determined and reasonably believe the detained person is concealing a controlled substance, a dangerous instrument, or contraband; or Under a circumstance or set of conditions in which there has been a prior incident of possession of a controlled substance, a dangerous instrument, contraband, or any other item that creates grave danger to property or injury to persons and substantially obstructs the performance of the institutional functions of the local detention facility, the circumstance or set of conditions give rise to a substantial likelihood that a similar incident may occur again, and the local detention facility has a written policy authorizing a strip search under the circumstances or set of conditions. The act requires that each local detention facility document the number of, reason for, and results of a strip search in a report that each facility must submit annually to the jail standards advisory committee and the Colorado attorney general. The act requires detention facility personnel to record strip searches via body-worn camera and limits access to the recordings. The act requires each sheriff to coordinate with the sheriff's body-worn camera vendor to implement a tag for strip searches in body-worn camera footage tagging options and ensure that strip search footage has the most restrictive level of access available within the sheriff's body-worn camera system. The act requires local detention facilities to have a policy detailing staff protocol for responding to suspected, alleged, or witnessed sexual abuse and requires staff to report suspected, alleged, or witnessed sexual abuse. The act creates whistleblower protection policies for jail staff and creates a right of action against a local detention facility for a staff member who was subject to an adverse employment action because the staff member disclosed information to the proper supervising authority about sexual abuse or sex-based harassment in the local detention facility. The act requires local detention facilities to inform prisoners of their rights and the resources available to them if they are a victim of sexual abuse while in jail and allow sexual assault advocates to access prisoners who request advocacy services. The act requires local detention facilities to designate a 'Prison Rape Elimination Act of 2003' (PREA) coordinator and requires jails to provide the coordinator's contact information to prisoners and the public. The act requires the removal of peace officers standards and training board (P.O.S.T. board) certification from any peace officer who is found by an administrative law judge, hearing officer, or internal investigation to have sexually abused a prisoner in a local detention facility. The act appropriates $38,916 to the department of law from the P.O.S.T. board cash fund for P.O.S.T. board support. (Note: This summary applies to this bill as enacted.)

Status timeline

Every recorded action on HB26-1123, oldest first
DateLocationAction
02/04/2026HouseIntroduced In House - Assigned to Judiciary
03/11/2026HouseHouse Committee on Judiciary Refer Amended to Appropriations
03/20/2026HouseHouse Committee on Appropriations Refer Amended to House Committee of the Whole
03/24/2026HouseHouse Second Reading Laid Over Daily - No Amendments
03/31/2026HouseHouse Second Reading Special Order - Passed with Amendments - Committee, Floor
04/01/2026HouseHouse Third Reading Laid Over Daily - No Amendments
04/02/2026HouseHouse Third Reading Passed - No Amendments
04/06/2026SenateIntroduced In Senate - Assigned to Judiciary
04/08/2026SenateSenate Committee on Judiciary Lay Over Unamended - Amendment(s) Failed
04/22/2026SenateSenate Committee on Judiciary Refer Amended to Appropriations
04/28/2026SenateSenate Committee on Appropriations Refer Unamended to Senate Committee of the Whole
04/30/2026SenateSenate Second Reading Laid Over Daily - No Amendments
05/01/2026SenateSenate Second Reading Laid Over to 05/04/2026 - No Amendments
05/04/2026SenateSenate Second Reading Passed with Amendments - Committee, Floor
05/05/2026SenateSenate Third Reading Passed with Amendments - Floor
05/06/2026HouseHouse Considered Senate Amendments - Result was to Laid Over Daily
05/07/2026HouseHouse Considered Senate Amendments - Result was to Concur - Repass
05/20/2026HouseSigned by the Speaker of the House
05/20/2026SenateSigned by the President of the Senate
05/20/2026GovernorSent to the Governor
05/27/2026GovernorGovernor Signed

Recorded votes

Proposed amendments (17 proposed amendments)

Amendments proposed to HB26-1123, oldest first
AmendmentCommittee / floor hearingOfferedDispositionOfficial document
L.001Committee amendment — Judiciary (House)03/11/2026PassedView official document
L.002Committee amendment — Judiciary (House)03/11/2026PassedView official document
L.003Committee amendment — Judiciary (House)03/11/2026PassedView official document
L.004Committee amendment — Judiciary (House)03/11/2026PassedView official document
L.005Committee amendment — Judiciary (House)03/11/2026PassedView official document
J.001Committee amendment — Appropriations (House)03/20/2026PassedView official document
L.011
Sponsor: Representative Stewart K.
Floor amendment — Second Reading (House)03/31/2026PassedView official document
L.014
Sponsor: Representative Stewart K.
Floor amendment — Second Reading (House)03/31/2026PassedView official document
L.012
Sponsor: Representative Stewart K.
Floor amendment — Second Reading (House)03/31/2026PassedView official document
L.017
Sponsor: Representative DeGraaf
Floor amendment — Second Reading (House)03/31/2026LostView official document
L.019Committee amendment — Judiciary (Senate)04/22/2026PassedView official document
L.020Committee amendment — Judiciary (Senate)04/22/2026PassedView official document
L.021Committee amendment — Judiciary (Senate)04/22/2026PassedView official document
L.022Committee amendment — Judiciary (Senate)04/22/2026PassedView official document
L.023Committee amendment — Judiciary (Senate)04/22/2026PassedView official document
L.024
Sponsor: Senator Weissman
Floor amendment — Second Reading (Senate)05/04/2026PassedView official document
L.025
Sponsor: Senator Weissman
Floor amendment — Third Reading (Senate)05/05/2026PassedView official document

Source: Colorado General Assembly (leg.colorado.gov) · Data as of

Full text

Official record

View HB26-1123 on leg.colorado.gov

Source: Colorado General Assembly (leg.colorado.gov) · Data as of

Verify this record

This record carries a fingerprint of its official content, computed by our data pipeline with the SHA-256 algorithm — a real computation over the record itself, not a badge we award ourselves. Anyone can recompute it from the official source and compare.

SHA-256 fingerprint

ed16c170bad05c99b30cf99b87af54ad6d7696630b9eb6cd64b1805bf37cf76c

What it covers: the record exactly as the official source publishes it — its identifiers (bill number, session, jurisdiction), its official title and long title, its official summary, its status, its sponsors in published order, every recorded action, every recorded vote, and the link to each official text version — assembled in a fixed canonical form described on the How this data works page.

Computed 2026-11-06 · Algorithm: SHA-256 · Canonical form: rogata-canonical-v1

Source: Colorado General Assembly (leg.colorado.gov) · Data as of

The fingerprint does not cover our retrieval date (the “Data as of” stamp in the source line): re-fetching unchanged official content produces the same fingerprint, while any change to the official content changes it.

If you recompute the fingerprint from the official source and get a different value, one of us is out of date — please report it through the corrections log.