HB26-1043 · Bill · 2026 Regular Session · Colorado

Transportation Network Company Discriminatory Practices

Concerning measures to address discriminatory conduct engaged in by transportation network company drivers in providing services to riders.

Official status: Became Law

2 proposed amendments

Prime sponsors

Progress (from the official record)

Official summary

Official text — shown in English exactly as published by the official source. The official text controls.

Under current law, the public utilities commission (commission) may assess a civil penalty in an amount up to $550 against a transportation network company (TNC) if the TNC had written notice of a TNC driver's violation of certain prohibitions against discriminating against riders and the TNC failed to reasonably address the violation. Additionally, a driver is required to report to the TNC any refusal by the driver to provide services to a rider, and the TNC is required to annually report all such refusals to the commission. The act removes the condition that a TNC first have written notice of a driver's violation of the discriminatory prohibitions before a civil penalty may be assessed against the TNC, increases the maximum civil penalty to $1,300, and requires the commission to consider certain mitigating and aggravating factors in determining whether to assess a civil penalty and the amount of a penalty assessed. The act also requires: A TNC to mandate and provide education to drivers concerning the transportation of riders with service animals; A TNC to provide monthly, rather than annual, reporting to the commission regarding drivers' refusal to provide services; A TNC to provide a mechanism to allow a consumer to report a driver's refusal to provide transport to the consumer directly on the TNC's digital platform, which information must be included in the TNC's monthly report; and The commission to aggregate and anonymize the TNCs' monthly reports and make the anonymized reports available to the public. (Note: This summary applies to this bill as enacted.)

Status timeline

Every recorded action on HB26-1043, oldest first
DateLocationAction
01/14/2026HouseIntroduced In House - Assigned to Business Affairs & Labor
02/19/2026HouseHouse Committee on Business Affairs & Labor Refer Amended to Finance
03/12/2026HouseHouse Committee on Finance Refer Unamended to Appropriations
05/01/2026HouseHouse Committee on Appropriations Refer Unamended to House Committee of the Whole
05/05/2026HouseHouse Second Reading Special Order - Passed with Amendments - Committee, Floor
05/06/2026HouseHouse Third Reading Passed - No Amendments
05/07/2026SenateIntroduced In Senate - Assigned to Finance
05/07/2026SenateSenate Committee on Finance Refer Unamended to Senate Committee of the Whole
05/08/2026SenateSenate Second Reading Special Order - Passed - No Amendments
05/11/2026SenateSenate Third Reading Passed - No Amendments
05/20/2026HouseSigned by the Speaker of the House
05/20/2026SenateSigned by the President of the Senate
05/20/2026GovernorSent to the Governor
06/01/2026GovernorGovernor Signed

Recorded votes

Proposed amendments (2 proposed amendments)

Amendments proposed to HB26-1043, oldest first
AmendmentCommittee / floor hearingOfferedDispositionOfficial document
L.001Committee amendment — Business Affairs & Labor (House)02/19/2026PassedView official document
L.002
Sponsor: Representative Rydin
Floor amendment — Second Reading (House)05/05/2026PassedView official document

Source: Colorado General Assembly (leg.colorado.gov) · Data as of

Full text

Full text — side-by-side reader

Showing the latest official version: Signed Act version (official PDF), 06/03/2026

Official text — shown in English exactly as published by the official source. The official text controls.

HOUSE BILL 26-1043

BY REPRESENTATIVE(S) Rydin and Paschal, Bacon, Boesenecker, Brown, Clifford, Duran, English, Froelich, Jackson, Marshall, Nguyen, Ricks, Rutinel, Sirota, Story, Willford, Zokaie, McCluskie; also SENATOR(S) Kipp, Benavidez, Cutter, Exum, Gonzales J., Hinrichsen, Jodeh, Kolker, Marchman, Sullivan, Wallace, Coleman.

CONCERNING MEASURES TO ADDRESS DISCRIMINATORY CONDUCT ENGAGED IN BY TRANSPORTATION NETWORK COMPANY DRIVERS IN PROVIDING SERVICES TO RIDERS.

Be it enacted by the General Assembly ofthe State of Colorado:

SECTION 1. In Colorado Revised Statutes, 40-10.1-605, amend (7) and (9); and add (6)(e) and (11) as follows: 40-10.1-605. Operational requirements - rules. (6) (e) EXCEPT FOR TRANSPORTATION NETWORK COMPANIES THAT PROVIDE A MAJORITY OF SERVICES FOR SCHOOL DISTRICTS OR SCHOOLS PURSUANT TO A CONTRACT REQUIRED BY SUBSECTION ( 1)(p) OF THIS SECTION:

Capital letters or bold & italic numbers indicate new material added to existing law; dashes through words or numbers indicate deletions from existing law and such material is not part of the act.

(I) A TRANSPORTATION NETWORK COMPANY SHALL MANDATE AND PROVIDE EDUCATION TO DRIVERS CONCERNING THE TRANSPORTATION OF RIDERS WITH SERVICE ANIMALS, INCLUDING EDUCATION ON THE PROHIBITION AGAINST DENYING A SERVICE ANIMAL FROM ACCOMPANYING A RIDER PURSUANT TO SUBSECTION ( 6)( c) OF THIS SECTION;

(II) A DRIVER SHALL COMPLETE THE MANDATORY SERVICE ANIMAL EDUCATION NO LATER THAN SIX MONTHS AFTER THE DRIVER IS FIRST ONBOARDED ON THE TRANSPORTATION NETWORK COMPANY'S DIGITAL PLATFORM OR SIX MONTHS AFTER THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THIS SUBSECTION

(6)( e), WHICHEVER IS LATER; (III) A TRANSPORTATION NETWORK COMPANY MAY RESTRICT OR SUSPEND A DRIVER'S ACCESS TO ITS DIGITAL PLATFORM IF THE DRIVER FAILS TO COMPLETE THE MANDATORY SERVICE ANIMAL EDUCATION WITHIN THE SIX-MONTH PERIOD DESCRIBED IN SUBSECTION (6)(e)(II) OF THIS SECTION; AND

(IV) AS SOON AS PRACTICABLE, A TRANSPORTATION NETWORK COMPANY

SHALL

ADOPT

A

POLICY

THAT

PROHIBITS

UNLAWFUL

DISCRIMINATION, AS DESCRIBED IN THIS SUBSECTION (6), AND SHALL:

(A) PROVIDE THE POLICY TO EACH DRIVER ON THE TRANSPORTATION NETWORK COMPANY'S DIGITAL NETWORK; AND

POST THE POLICY ON THE TRANSPORTATION NETWORK COMPANY'S WEBSITE.

(7) (a) A trnnsportation netwotk company is not liable fut a dtivet's violation of subsection (6) of this section unless the dt iv et 's \1 iolation has been pteviously reported to the trnnsportation netwotk company in writing, and the tt ansportation network company has failed to t easonably addt ess the alleged violation. The commission shall affotd a trnnsportation netwotk company the same due pt ocess rights affm ded transportation providers in defending against THE COMMISSION SHALL TAKE INTO CONSIDERATION A TRANSPORTATION NETWORK COMPANY'S GOOD FAITH EFFORTS, INCLUDING EFFORTS DESCRIBED IN SUBSECTION (6), (9)(b), OR (9)(c) OF THIS SECTION, TO REMEDIA TE A DRIVER'S FIRST VIOLATION OF SUBSECTION ( 6) OF THIS SECTION AND THE TOTAL NUMBER OF VIOLATIONS BY A TRANSPORTATION NETWORK COMPANY THAT HAVE OCCURRED IN THE PRECEDING TWELVE

MONTHS IN DETERMINING WHETHER TO ASSESS CIVIL PENALTIES AND THE AMOUNT OF THE civil penalties assessed by the commission PURSUANT TO SUBSECTION (7)(b) OF THIS SECTION. (b) The commission may assess a civil penalty IN AN AMOUNT up to fi~e hundred fifty ONE THOUSAND THREE HUNDRED dollars under this subsection (7) FOR A TRANSPORTATION NETWORK COMPANY'S VIOLATION OF SUBSECTION (6), (9)(b), OR (9)(c) OF THIS SECTION. (9) (a) A driver shall immediately report to the transportation network company any refusal to transport a passenger pursuant to paragraph (a) of subsection (6) SUBSECTION (6) of this section. and (b) The transportation network company shall annually report aH such refusals ANY REFUSALS TO TRANSPORT IN VIOLATION OF SUBSECTION (6) OF THIS SECTION to the commission ON A MONTHLY BASIS in a form and manner determined by the commission; EXCEPT THAT A TRANSPORTATION NETWORK COMPANY THAT PROVIDES A MAJORITY OF SERVICES FOR SCHOOL DISTRICTS OR SCHOOLS PURSUANT TO A CONTRACT REQUIRED BY SUBSECTION (l)(p) OF THIS SECTION SHALL SUBMIT THE REPORTS ON A QUARTERLY BASIS. (c) EXCEPT FOR TRANSPORTATION NETWORK COMPANIES THAT PROVIDE A MAJORITY OF SERVICES FOR SCHOOL DISTRICTS OR SCHOOLS PURSUANT TO A CONTRACT REQUIRED BY SUBSECTION ( 1)(p) OF THIS SECTION, A TRANSPORTATION NETWORK COMPANY SHALL PROVIDE A MECHANISM TO ALLOW A CONSUMER TO REPORT DIRECTLY ON THE TRANSPORTATION NETWORK COMPANY'S DIGITAL PLATFORM A DRIVER'S REFUSAL TO TRANSPORT THE CONSUMER IN VIOLATION OF SUBSECTION ( 6) OF THIS SECTION. THE REPORTING MECHANISM MUST BE ACCESSIBLE AND EASILY NAVIGABLE ON THE DIGITAL PLATFORM. THE TRANSPORTATION NETWORK COMPANY SHALL INCLUDE ANY CONSUMER REPORTS RECEIVED PURSUANT TO THIS SUBSECTION (9)( C) IN THE TRANSPORTATION NETWORK COMPANY'S MONTHLY REPORTS SUBMITTED PURSUANT TO SUBSECTION (9)(b) OF THIS SECTION. ( d) THE COMMISSION SHALL AGGREGATE AND ANONYMIZE THE DATA INCLUDED IN THE MONTHLY REPORTS SUBMITTED PURSUANT TO SUBSECTIONS (9)(b) AND (9)(c) OF THIS SECTION; INCLUDE IN THE AGGREGATED, ANONYMIZED MONTHLY REPORTS INFORMATION ON THE

ANNUAL NUMBER OF REFUSALS TO TRANSPORT IN VIOLATION OF SUBSECTION ( 6) OF THIS SECTION AND THIS SUBSECTION (9), INCLUDING THE NUMBER OF INVESTIGATIONS AND REMEDIATIONS MADE; AND MAKE THE AGGREGATED, ANONYMIZED MONTHLY REPORTS AVAILABLE TO THE PUBLIC. (11) (a) EXCEPT AS PROVIDED IN SUBSECTIONS (l l)(b) AND (l l)(c) OF THIS SECTION, A TRANSPORTATION NETWORK COMPANY THAT PROVIDES SERVICES PURSUANT TO SUBSECTION ( 1)(p) OF THIS SECTION IS GOVERNED EXCLUSIVELY BY THE TERMS OF THE CONTRACT; THIS PART 6, EXCEPT WHEREIN A TRANSPORTATION NETWORK COMPANY THAT PROVIDES SERVICES PURSUANT TO SUBSECTION (l)(p) OF THIS SECTION IS EXPLICITLY EXEMPTED FROM A PROVISION OF THIS PART 6; AND RULES THAT THE COMMISSION ADOPTS PURSUANT TO THIS PART 6. (b)

SUBSECTION (7) OF THIS SECTION DOES NOT APPLY TO

TRANSPORTATION NETWORK COMPANY SERVICES PROVIDED PURSUANT TO SUBSECTION ( 1)(p) OF THIS SECTION, BUT APPLIES TO ALL OTHER TRANSPORTATION NETWORK COMPANY SERVICES. (c)

THIS SUBSECTION (11) DOES NOT LIMIT A TRANSPORTATION

NETWORK COMPANY'S OR A DRIVER'S OBLIGATIONS UNDER APPLICABLE STA TE OR FEDERAL NONDISCRIMINATION OR PUBLIC ACCOMMODATION LAWS, INCLUDING PUBLIC ACCOMMODATION LIABILITY LAWS UNDER PART 6 OF ARTICLE 34 OF TITLE 24, FOR DENIAL OF SERVICES OR OTHER PROHIBITED DISCRIMINATORY BEHAVIOR.

SECTION 2. Act subject to petition - effective date applicability. (1) This act takes effect January 1, 2027; except that, if a referendum petition is filed pursuant to section 1 (3) of article V of the state constitution against this act or an item, section, or part of this act within the ninety-day period after final adjournment of the general assembly, then the act, item, section, or part will not take effect unless approved by the people at the general election to be held in November 2026 and, in such case, will take effect January 1, 2027, or on the date of the official declaration of the vote thereon by the governor, whichever is later.

(2) This act applies to conduct occurring on or after the applicable effective date of this act.

Julie McCluskie SPEAKER OF THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

James Rashad Coleman, Sr. PRESIDENT OF THE SENATE

Vanessa Reilly CHIEF CLERK OF THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

Esther van Mourik SECRETARY OF THE SENATE

APPROVED on Monday June 1st 2026 at 11:00am (Date and Time)

Jared S. Polis GOVERNOR OF THE STATE OF COLORADO

Official record

View HB26-1043 on leg.colorado.gov

Source: Colorado General Assembly (leg.colorado.gov) · Data as of

Verify this record

This record carries a fingerprint of its official content, computed by our data pipeline with the SHA-256 algorithm — a real computation over the record itself, not a badge we award ourselves. Anyone can recompute it from the official source and compare.

SHA-256 fingerprint

e42eb35fac7220281a05387c1923002ce3529dd5fbfb9b819881d511c45288b3

What it covers: the record exactly as the official source publishes it — its identifiers (bill number, session, jurisdiction), its official title and long title, its official summary, its status, its sponsors in published order, every recorded action, every recorded vote, and the link to each official text version — assembled in a fixed canonical form described on the How this data works page.

Computed 2026-11-06 · Algorithm: SHA-256 · Canonical form: rogata-canonical-v1

Source: Colorado General Assembly (leg.colorado.gov) · Data as of

The fingerprint does not cover our retrieval date (the “Data as of” stamp in the source line): re-fetching unchanged official content produces the same fingerprint, while any change to the official content changes it.

If you recompute the fingerprint from the official source and get a different value, one of us is out of date — please report it through the corrections log.